Skip to main content
The Law Offices of Ricky Malik, P.C.

Read Our Current Blogs

BIA on Sentence “actually imposed”: suspended execution of sentence vs imposition of sentence suspended

All too often any criminal sentence imposed is considered the actual punishment in the Immigration context.  The Board of Immigration Appeals addressed this issue 15 years ago in Matter of Esposito, 21 I&N Dec. 1 (BIA 1995). “For purposes of section 212(a)(10) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(10) (1988), and its successor provision at section 212(a)(2)(B) […]

Read More

4th Circuit Court of Appeals holds 245(i) does not waive 212(a)(9)(C)(i)(I)’s reentry after unlawfully present for 1 year bar

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals joined the Second and Sixth Circuit to affirm the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision in Matter of Briones, 24 I&N Dec. 355 (BIA 2007).  The Fourth Circuit determined that an applicant who seeks to adjust status under INA 245(i) (8 USC 1255(i)) does not automatically over come INA 212(a)(9)(C)(i)(I)’s bar.  INA 212(a)(9)(C)(i)(I) deems a foreign national inadmissible if […]

Read More

BIA on Admission: Matter of Graciela QUILANTAN, 25 I&N Dec. 285 (BIA 2010). Need only prove procedural regularity

It seems that this decision can have far-reaching consequences.  The concept of admission and being admitted forms one of the cornerstones of adjusting status in the United States to Lawful Permanent Resident (LPR or green card status).  This decision could open the door allowing TPS holders to adjust status based on their “admission” pursuant to INA 244.  Or possibly for […]

Read More

Supreme Court addresses Coram Nobis & All Writs Act (Post Conviction Relief)

“The writ of coram nobis is an ancient common-law remedy designed “to correct errors of fact.” United States v. Morgan , 346 U. S. 502, 507 (1954). In American jurisprudence the precise contours of coram nobis have not been “well defined,” Bronson v. Schulten , 104 U. S. 410, 416 (1882), but the writ traces its origins to the King’s Bench and the Court of Common Pleas. United States v. Plumer , 27 F. Cas. 561, […]

Read More

Supreme Court: The Landmark Drug Case addressing Aggravated Felonies

In December 2006, in an 8-1 decision, the Supreme Court reversed years of blanket rulings that held almost all drug crimes to be aggravated felonies. INA 101(a)(43)(B) defines an aggravated felony to include “illicit trafficking in a controlled substance (as described in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act), including a drug trafficking crime (as defined in section 924(c) of title 18, […]

Read More

Immigration’s Stance on Drug Paraphernailia

The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) issued a decision in November 2009, Matter of Martinez Espinoza, 25 I&N Dec. 118 (BIA 2009) where it had to decide how drug paraphernalia offenses should be treated under the inadmissiblity provisions of the immigration laws. The Board did find that drug paraphernalia can render an alien inadmissible, but left open the possiblilty for a foreign […]

Read More

Even if you got your Greencard through the fraudulent actions of an Immigration Officer, you are still removable (deportable)

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit reviewed the matter, wherein hundreds of Koreans received fraudulent green cards through the criminal conspiracy of a former officer of the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”), Leland Sustaire. The Court found that it did not have jurisdiction when an Immigration Officer commits criminal fraud.  The Court did leave open the possibility for the Executive […]

Read More

Focused on Clear Solutions Our firm is committed to simplifying your immigration process

Mr. Malik has always been a tireless advocate for the rights of immigrants in the United States, and has aggressively and relentlessly advocated on behalf of countless businesses and individuals.

Talk with Ricky


Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.